Dear comrades of the Executive Bureau of the Fourth International,
A few days
ago we received in the mailing list of the bureaus an e-mail containing a link
to your statement “The future of the workers of Europe is being decided in
Greece”, which is published on the site of the International Viewpoint.
It was a
big surprise for us to realize that it was a statement concerning Greece and
the social, class struggles that are taking place in the country during the
last 2.5 years, without any attempt to ask the Greek section or at least some
of its members beforehand. Something like this should have happened even for
your own information, as we can detect inaccuracies in the statement’s content
and references to political positions (of SYRIZA) that are not valid any more.
This exposes the Executive Bureau’s deficient knowledge of these subjects, but
it exposes even more the lack of coordination within the FI. We want to
underline that it is not the first time that our section is ostentatiously
ignored and that decisions concerning the movement and the political
environment we act in are taken without asking us about the section’s
positions, without even expressing any interest in what its political decisions
are and what problems a statement which is opposed to those decisions may
create. OKDE-Spartakos is a political organization with a leadership and with
collective processes by which it decides its political directions and planning.
If anything, you should be interested in this planning. It is not always easy
for us to translate our texts in other languages, however the FI’s role remains
to coordinate all sections in order to avoid misunderstandings, errors and
distortions.
Dear comrades,
you know that the Greek section has taken the political decision to participate
in the Unitarian anti-capitalist left project of ANTARSYA. We are building this
front confronting consistently its contradictions as well as the political
disagreements and the different political traditions there are within it. We
spend much of our political and personal time working for the reinforcement and
for the success of this anti-capitalist left front by applying its planning, in
which OKDE-Spartakos itself has contributed. As you can easily understand,
therefore, a statement such as the one published on the IV leads to questioning
our political decisions and our organization’s credibility in the eyes of our
allies, it deprives us of the support of our international organization and it
displays our international as if it were a pendulum, swinging according to the
(electoral) wind. In this way it undermines our effort to make ANTARSYA
approach the International.
To be more
concrete, you focus on and you propose as a spearhead of the political struggle
in Greece the 5-point emergency plan of SYRIZA, with which its leadership has
negotiated with New Democracy, PASOK, the Independent Greeks and the Democratic
Left to form a government. This plan includes, for example, point 4 about
abolition of immunity of ministers from prosecution, a demand which is
irrelevant for the left and was put onto the agenda by the populist and the far
right. By the way, these 5 points have recently been reconsidered by SYRIZA
itself, which is continuously yielding to the pressures applied by the dominant
class. The newest official development is that SYRIZA doesn’t promise any more
to unilaterally abort the memorandum, but to replace it by a new national
economic plan renegotiating with creditors and the EU. SYRIZA doesn’t speak
about nationalization of banks (let alone workers’ control), but about “public
control” by the state. This is something different from point 2 of Syriza’s
five point agenda, which, by the way, concerns only those banks that have
already received generous help from the state. It is really a question about
which demand we consider to be a transitional demand: the three year moratorium
of payoffs which SYRIZA proposes or the cancellation of the debt advanced buy
ANTARSYA? Who is going to be asked to pay for the debt after those three years?
Unless we think that nowadays, in the middle of the biggest crisis of
capitalism after World War II and in a country that has been living under class
war conditions for 3 years, a transitional program would be a luxury and that
what we need instead is simply a bourgeois-democratic “emergency plan”.
It is
astonishing that the statement doesn’t even propose a critical vote or an
effort for a programmatic agreement, but a total political alignment with
SYRIZA and its emergency plan!
We all
realize the importance that the formation of a government to the left of
social-democracy in the next election would have for working people in Greece
and all over Europe. Such a fact could improve their self-confidence and
contribute, under certain circumstances, to a further rise of struggles.
However, SYRIZA does its best in order to prevent the development of such a
process in favor of working people. The only hope for something like this to
happen is for a credible anti-capitalist force to its left to exist. Otherwise,
after some months a possible SYRIZA government will collapse leaving an open
field for a right-wing government, like has happened in other cases in Europe
(Italy…), or, even worse, for a far right turn. We think it is crucial for the
Greek anti-capitalist left and particularly for ANTARSYA to go on with a united
front tactic, but at the same time it should preserve its political
independence and the anti-capitalist transitional program by which it has
carried out difficult struggles in trade unions, workplaces and among the
youth. ANTARSYA shouldn’t turn into one more left force that tails after
reformist administrative illusions. Comrades, an anti-capitalist left exist in
Greece, and it cannot negate itself in the name of 5 points that set aside the
unilateral rejection of the memoranda, the cancellation of all debt and the
nationalization of banks and big enterprises under workers control.
It is
significant that while you are asking Greek workers to vote for a left
government that would abolish the memoranda and all reactionary labour
counter-reforms, SYRIZA has already started to speak about a renegotiation of
the memoranda so as not to lose votes, yielding to the pressures of mass media
and the dominant class. It is enough to say that the president of SYRIZA has
proposed as prime minister of the transitional government G. Arsenis, a former
Minister of Education of PASOK who was a devoted enemy of working people, the
youth and the large-scale movement that resisted his reforms and who was
responsible for thousands of unemployed teachers and for the accentuation of
barriers against working class children and poor strata trying to enter
second-grade or third-grade education (we just wonder, where means to an end
should stop?). One more example: SYRIZA doesn’t promise any more to cancel all
cuts, but just to restore wages to the level they were at before February,
which is after two years of austerity and of social struggles (this makes a
lower salary of 751 euro, obligatory fund contributions and taxes included…).
Despite all this, ANTARSYA met SYRIZA and agreed to cooperate and march
together in the struggles. However, in case of a left government, ANTARSYA will
take a critical stance, supporting progressive measures and actively opposing
any retreat.
We are in
agreement with the struggle for the United Socialist States of Europe. But how
can this happen? By defending the “EU of the peoples” and its bourgeois
supranational mechanisms, like the reformist left does, or by a class struggle
in European-scale coordination in order to destroy the EU? By concealing or by
revealing in the eyes of working people and the unemployed masses that the EU
serves the interests of international Capital and squeezes workers, a majority
of whom still consider it a progressive institution? Euro-zone, the Euro
currency and austerity policies that have accompanied their existence since the
very beginning are not something to be fought against by workers in Greece and
all around Europe? Will the EU disintegrate by itself or must the working
classes of Europe challenge it, having a counter proposal instead?
Unfortunately
we realize with anguish that the Fourth International is not capable of playing
the role it should play in this historical period and we wonder where we are
going… Although the Fourth International is an international coordination of
small revolutionary organizations around the globe, its word and its statements
have considerable weight and resonance among the international workers vanguard
which is getting ever more massive and politicized. It should offer an
orientation, with all the forces at its disposal, for the accomplishment of a
transitional program that breaks with capitalism. This is even more valid for
Greece, where the rise of workers’ movements puts on the agenda aspects of such
a program, as happened last October, when we had the first signs of a direct
challenge against the employer’s managerial prerogative, with all public
services occupied by workers. The Fourth International should cultivate the
conviction that revolution is possible today.
The
Central Committee of OKDE-Spartacos (Greek section of the Fourth International)
The reply of the EB of the FI can
be found here: <http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article2643>
No comments:
Post a Comment